For lots of reasons I’m a basically aggressive kind of person. In my case that aggression tends toward the intellectual, I mean you use the gifts you’re given right.  In the last few years, illness and other things have slowed my mind, but in the last couple of months I’ve begun to feel the snap-snap-snap of my mind turning back on. It’s frakkin wonderful.

However, apparently not everyone feels that way.

Here’s an amusing example.

I recently joined a poetry group on a professional networking site. I just watched the threads build for a couple of weeks, to get a feel for what is discussed, etc. I commented on a few posts – “nice use of form to support meaning” etc. I went to check out a couple of the attached blogs – writers that post in forums often have blogs of their own as well. In one case I left a question about that very poem to which I had appended the comment “nice use of form”.

The thing about forums and blogs is they have different “rules”.  A blog is a sort of personal space. It is run by a group or a single person with the right to think and speak their point of view. You open yourself to dissenters of course, but it is your “home” and you can dis-invite at will. But a forum is something else. It’s more like a classroom where rules of collegiate discourse apply. That’s why when you get a silly-assed commenter just there to fart in public, one calls them a troll. (Sorry to Troll folk out there.) On a personal blog one simply “deletes”; the blogger is his or her own moderator. On a forum that job falls to someone specific – or it should do.

My comment on the writer’s blog seems to be what started this.

His poem had a stanza that said (essentially) that the world would adjust to your “tune”

I said:

Love the way you use form here, but…

You know how when you go swimming in a lake and if feels like, after the horrible cold shock of plunging, the water rapidly gets warmer? Nope. You get colder and fit yourself to the temperature of the lake. So really eventually you will harmonize to the world’s tune.

The comment was not well received. But OK. It’s his blog, so I just left and didn’t go back, just like if I was in a lecture hall and I didn’t agree with the speaker’s conclusions. I can speak to it, but essentially, for the duration, the hall is his or her “home”. So you leave if you don’t like it. That’s what common courtesy (and democracy) demands.

There was another commenter on that personal blog (we’ll call him Mr (all in caps) Odd Online Name) that tried to shut me down. Rather rudely. The owner of the blog, to his credit, said that all commenters were welcome.

Mr Odd Online Name is also a member of the poetry group I just joined.

A few days after this incident I posted my first question for the group. I decided to go with very, very basic poetics and thus be non-confrontational.

I said:

Anyone here have a strong preference of poetic orientation? Lyric or mimetic? If you do have a preference, do you know why? Curious is all.

Apparently Mr (all in caps) Odd Online Name had been lurking. He responded to the thread with this:

Mr (all in caps) Odd Online Name • First of all, I request you to kindly mend your tone and tenor Mr. (portion of my actual birth name). You are not a chilled bottle of Beer I suppose. Please don’t denigrate yourself. What is your credibility to talk about strong preference of poetic orientation? Here there are no lunatics under the guise of poets. If anyone is a lunatic he would answer you. Finally, I should say that have nothing personal against you. I have seen many who crave for instant popularity at the cost of the real poets. I will not tolerate anyone who insults the honorable poetic community.

I laughed. LOL’d for quite a while. Then I waited for a day to see what the group would do.

Nothing at first.

Here’s what I wanted to post in response:

Dear Mr (all in caps) Odd Online Name,

Thank you for your reply to my question. I will assume that you are simply ignorant of the basic terminology in my query, and so will direct you to a resource where you can remedy your problem. I suggest you start with The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, which has an entry called “Poetics” and addresses Western and Eastern forms of poetry, broadly the terms I used, mimesis and lyric respectively.

I am glad to hear that you have nothing against me, but such a protestation of friendship as you made does make me wonder if you use comparable language with all strangers who ask questions about poetic preferences. Perhaps you just need a better translation program so that you can be clearer in your use of English? Since it seems absolutely crazy to attack a perfect stranger on a professional networking site, and even madder to attack another poet in a poetry group for talking absolutely basic poetics, I will assume you are just incapable of accurate or sensitive use of language at this point in your education. Such and interesting thing in a “real” poet.

I suppose I should address the question of “credibility,” but I’m quite sure my two graduate degrees, publication credits and status as a educator give me no position of any real importance; I am quite sure whatever your background happens to be is of much greater importance to you.

As for asinine posturing and those who crave popularity, I am quite sure you know much more about that than I, so I will leave that to your clearly practiced hands. I feel quite happy, even gleeful, at the image of you protecting “the honorable poetic community” so I wish to offer you my sincere thanks for such an entertaining welcome to this group.

And finally, Mr (all in caps) Odd Online Name are you really making fun of my name?

Yours sincerely,

(My other name)

But I didn’t. Moderation in all things, yes?

And of course, some of the group members posted remonstrations.  But really, what sets people like this guy off?

August 26th, 2011

bad moods

suck

and here I am in another one today. Don’t know why except that I have developed a ganglion cyst on my left foot and the fucker makes my whole foot ache.

and this poem I’m writing is kicking my ass

and, and, and…I could probably whinge-around all day.

I’ll try to control my temper in future posts but I’m promising nothing.

I get so frakkin tired of people trying to replace anger with love. Sometimes anger is the right response. Someone spits on you, the right emotional response is anger. You can choose whatever behaviour will get you out of the situation clean, but anger is the right feeling to such basic disrespect.

I get really tired of it when that someone is another woman telling me how I should respond. As long as I choose my behaviour carefully, protect myself and those who are vulnerable, what the frak is so scary about an angry woman? Really. Do you know?

Anyway, in celebration of appropriate anger here is a poem by Gregory Scofield.

Not too Polite Poetics

his diagnosis was not conclusively cutting edge
nor was the conversation charming
like was I a closet peace pipe smoker
or did I eat rabbits
with the fur still on

but what was my tee-pee creeping technique
did I make my move closing time
sneak up cruise past
make those heads tilt eyes swing
just this way, boy

or simply hang around
looking seductively stoic
like a Curtis portrait
waiting and contemplating
their move

our west I discovered
I didn't need to kiss up
to graduate head of the class
despite the prerequisite
keeping my mouth in check

not polite to stick my grudge nose
in their Native Lit class
say my piece on First Nations first voice
demand Kinsella visit Hobbema
or take a course in Cree colloquial syntax

like all First Nations writers
I must adhere to ethnic demands
make my poet's entrance
wrapped in a Pendelton blanket
sunburst geometric design

maybe a Navojo ring or two
to give me the authentic look
a ghost dance shirt
might come in handy
reflecting history bullets

when I get too mouthy
for their comfort
they want Yeats Dickinson Longfellow
a cosy chit-chat afterward

I barely pass the visiting poet's test,
answer why I'm so angry
so impolite, so defensive
is not what I want here
but the chance to speak

without backs up or a drum solo

January 9th, 2011

grouch, grouch, grouch

Stars! I am such a grouch today. I was fine until almost exactly 2pm and then – bam! – instant foul mood. WTF, I say.

I went home, went to bed and slept for four hours. In the middle of frakkin day. And still woke up like a pit viper on mad-juice. I want to be a tyrannosaurus, eat all the cute little bunnies and destroy everything pink.

Blah.

I’m an aggressive person. And female. That seems to be a problem. I keep getting counselled to “let it go.”

Certain things make me really mad and to be truthful I suspect that at least some of the things that make me mad are the result of my pedophile “uncle” (hereafter known as “P”).

Yuck, I know. (Please relax. I am not going to tell you about that set of experiences, rather I would like to briefly meditate on the outcome today, all these decades later.)

I acknowledge that some of my aggression is the result of trauma and emotional damage. However, I suspect I would have been aggressive whether or not P turned up to the family property that summer. My father was a terrier with an attitude. He was, frankly, terrifying in his rages and drunken affection and I have inherited some of that disposition, although not the alcoholism. (I associate the feeling of being out of control with the hurt of others and therefore do not partake to the point where I feel that instability which precedes drunkenness.) What I suspect is that P narrowed the focus of the natural aggression. I react poorly, for example, to threats to my physical or emotional safety or to the safety of children or others under the power of a “well wishing” majority.

One time, as an example, a boyfriend thought that pushing me into a corner was the answer to my anger at a bit of his behaviour. Before I knew quite what was happening I had a pair of scissors in my hand and the points were headed for his throat. He had very long (and fast) legs. Last I saw of him he was booting it down the road outside the apartment.

I have fought very hard to control the actual outcome of my anger. I did not kill the bugger above, for example. And as soon as the threat was gone, so was the anger. I will not tolerate what I consider to be abusive behaviour. Even things as simply juvenile as snides, snarls, slammed doors and tossed heads in the work place I consider worthy of disparagement, nay, outright scorn. I recognize it makes me an uncomfortable, and vaguely threatening person to be around and there is no cure for that I’m afraid. I just stay away as much as is possible from people who are afraid or threatened by my presence. I don’t really care if a 30-something year old acts like a 10 year old except when I have to both witness it and suffer its effects. If you want to be a princess do it away from me. That’s all I require. I don’t think it too much really. And if you do decide to sport your tiara and flip your hair at me, I will attack.

A lot of people see that as a problem though. I keep being told that I can be assertive without being aggressive, for example. Actually, I’m not sure that this is really possible, not without changing an important component of what makes me me. It’s who I am, welded, now, to the bones of what I would have been.

I am a badger. Leave me alone and I am kind of fun to watch. But I have enviable claws and a disposition to dig.

I do like being me for the most part. While I have had several rather nasty things happen to me in my life, I feel more than compensated by my “gifts.” I hear the sky singing, for example, and when the brain shifts sideways I can also experience yellow as a “ting” sound and other such cross-modalities. I can think; I can reason. I can flow in and out of the experience called “art.” I have wonderful children and friends. I live in a country that will take care of me should I need it. And perhaps most importantly, I have a strong sense of ethics.

This last – my sense of what is OK and what is not OK in the commerce between people – I thank P for that. The horror that was his life, his actions, his pain and inability to control it, left me (and others) irrevocably changed. I can never be what I would have been, but I don’t think of justice as pertaining to the outcome for the transgressor but justice is rather the eventual outcome for the transgressed. And I think justice has been achieved: my life is a good one all told.

I am aggressive and not simply assertive, it’s true, but I suspect that my justice achieved is really due to my agression, so it is not something I would forgo for others’ comfort’s sake. I can’t help but think of the time and current places where the chucking of full grown women under the chin, the silly diminutive names and bottom pinchings that highlight genderized power disparities and the people who counsel the few outraged women to accept what men are like for the sake of peaceful co-existence. Rage has its problems, of course, but it is also the social change engine.

For me one key to living with rage is the control of my behaviour. Yes, I make most people uncomfortable but I never actively set out to hurt except in self defense. Rage is a form of power and it must be controlled. P taught me that. Still, I don’t think social ease is something that should be overtly fostered, rather the self awareness that must underpin any real acceptance of others should be the focus of our joint efforts. (I mean, the vocalizations of the deaf make many hearing people visibly uncomfortable. Whose problem is that?) Hair flippers that gain self awareness stop being hair flippers. Since I see the source of hair flipping and its generalized form, princess pouting as emotional immaturity and as such an emblem of emotional damage in a woman that should have achieved a higher level of maturity, I think that addressing that damage is the way to achieve justice. So I leave it alone until flipped and then inquire if the person realizes that she isn’t really a princess. “You do realize that daddy wasn’t really a king, don’t you?”

Don’t you think that should be warning enough? Certainly it’s  better than smacking her upside the head.

The other key to  living with rage is a profound respect for the nature of what is. Slipping into the easy but empirically incorrect comforts of belief is dangerous to self, but more importantly, dangerous to others. The princess pout limits the pouter but it actively hurts the eye and ear of the one witnessing the shocking loss of decorum. To be more serious, I do find that my ability to feel joy, to fall into awe, is directly relational to my ability to accept how I actually am, where from I, in fact, came and where to, in fact, I will go. Princess pouters cause me pain and while I can moderate my response to that pain, I cannot stop the pain itself. Nor should I have to really. It’s not that I expect the princesses of the world to stop being affected assholes, just that I expect them to do what I do and control their natural propensities. In other words, pout all you like, just don’t do it near me. I mean, really, all of us need to shit but most of us learn to do it in a way and place set apart for such unsocial needs. Princess pouting is just a sort of emotional defecation. Do it in private please.

I suppose you can see why I am not universally liked. Oh the joy of living with others.

May 21st, 2010

Free roaming targets

The last few days have  been rather odd. I had an interview last week and it seems to have been the last moment in a rather long stretch of work-related hysteria. Well, hysteria isn’t really the right word, as it implies something about being female that I don’t really intend. Is there a word for the frenetic behavioural state that results – from and in – a confusion or misplacement of purpose that doesn’t imply a gendered response but only a human one?

I don’t know the results of the interview yet, and frankly, dear….

The thing is that I really don’t.  It’s as if the interview, at the tail end of a divisive, team-shattering process, has reset some sort of inner target in my head.

And that realization made me think about how I have been in these last 50 some odd years.

It’s as if  I have a free floating targeting device in my head.  For example: moving along, a good day at the university, driving a well-loved country road, my mind just floating. Then – blip – focus – as it notices the signs of deer – drive – float – blip – focus – the condition of the tulee in the pocket wetland – drive – float – blip – focus – new plants in the white farmhouse bed in a yard – drive, float and then these two young men. Focus. They are driving what is probably their mother’s car, decide to slow down on the road in front of me. I slow down. They go even slower. I am very close to them now and the driver turns his head to the passenger and grins. And slows even more. So I pull out to pass and he speeds up and pulls in front of me.

The target snaps in place. I back down behind him and then the grin again. What happens next is that I run them off the road. The flash of terror on the driver’s face was gratifying.

I feel the hormonal rush for a little while but the target just unmoors and goes back to floating. Waiting for the next environmental trigger.

It’s not just anger that triggers the lock but it is a useful feeling. I am going to court in the next week on behalf of a young, deaf, Native American girl to protect her from persons who do not have her best interests in mind.

I’ll drive days when I am locked onto some specific case or project.

I’ll get in my car at 10 PM to drive 8 hours to get a niece who feels at risk. I’ll  find out a friend is in need, drop everything, drive across country to help.

Not good things, not bad things, just the effect of the targeting thing in my head.

The problem is not the feelings or the targeting aspect of my mind, but that I have so little control over what they seem to lock onto – some things that do matter, things that don’t really matter, things better left alone.

Better for me, if I could say – “hey you, lock on there.” The things my mind finds of critical importance are sometimes really odd.

Imagine if I could control the lock-on, if I was as imp0rtant to me as that young girl?

Stars! I would be fierce in my own defense.

Radical thought.

December 24th, 2009

Anger is odd

So two things happened of late that have made me think about anger, at least with respect to how I express it and what triggers it.

Personally, I think anger a wonderful feeling. It’s got a clean feel, and carefully guided, it is really useful. It is powerful though, and if it comes up forcefully and with surprise it can easily cause trouble. The thing is, that since my recent doctor’s orders (it’s much harder to surpress the feeling at the moment), I get mad at some new things and — surprisingly to me — just don’t get mad at others.
Read the rest of this entry »

September 15th, 2009

Irritation overload

So I am taking a class in the philosophy of consciousness. I’m doing it for fun.  I love research, loving slowly coming to understand how we humans do what we do. I love thinking about the assumptions we make as we move through our days.

Since it is right at the beginning of term I have only been to one class so far but in it I got the first reading assignment. Descartes.

Again. Descartes.

OK, so I know why. I even agree with the teaching strategy. He is clearly important to the development of Western thought about the idea of what consciousness is, but — Descartes.

Every time I read the bugger I want to hurl the book across the room. Radically doubting everthing down to the phenomenological subject, OK, I get that. But to say that we are going to rebuild the world, rebuild our sense of what we can trust (i.e. things our senses tell us, you know that there is monitor in front of your face, that it is not an illusion) after all that rigorous doubting by saying, ‘well we know god isn’t a deceiver…”  Excuse the fuck out of me! How does he know that, if all he can really trust is the fact of his existence? And if he can trust this thing he was told (you know the god thing), then why not some other thing he was told?

Bleh.

So I put down all my non-fiction, and went to the bookstore and found a Kate Shugak novel. I like Kate and her dog/wolf Mutt. An Indian woman that has a bunch of fearsome aunties, this I understand.  I like the way Kate kicks nasty ass. I like the way she is just plain honest about things.

I have another class tomorrow, but before then I will read Kate’s most recent (to me anyway) story and get the taste of Descartes gone. Bottom line: there is only so much of this rational irritation I can take before I need to take a bath is something more real.

Still there are lots of good authors coming up in the course handout. There’s Locke and Putnam, Fodor, Turing, Searle, Dennett, Churchland and Heil. I don’t agree with all of them, or even most of them (especially some days), but none of them make me want to hurl the book either.

I was reading The Daily Beast earlier today. In it there is an article called “Summer of Hate: 25 signs trouble is brewing.”  It’s just what the title implies: it lists 25 events in the American world since June of this year that seem to point toward a (probably) immanent explosion of violence like, perhaps, the one we saw in 1968 (which the article briefly mentions). It’s a nice title, since it gets its power from mocking the 1967 Summer of Love.

I remember 1968.  I was 12 and had moved from the northeast of the US to Houston, Texas. When Martin Luther King was shot, I had been in town less than a year. I didn’t know how to comport myself in the place. I didn’t know it wasn’t OK to let my dark-skinned neighbor child (a Mexican foster kid staying with a white foster mommy) into my house, and that based on that transgression, my neighbors’ parents wouldn’t let them play with me.  I didn’t know that my voice (with its faint British accent) would arouse such suspicion.  I didn’t know that it was OK for the white teachers in my school to reduce the Mexican-American Spanish teacher to tears by refusing to allow her to sit in the teachers’ lounge.  I was pretty stupid really and because of that I was kicked out of the sixth grade. (It was my first, but not last, expulsion.) I probably deserved it; I was terminally insolent.  I have to admit, to them, I was probably a really nasty little brat.
Read the rest of this entry »

When I was a child of about nine or so, some 6 years before I would move to Britain and go on my adolescent tour, but some time (a year or so) after the last shorter visit with relations in England, I lived for a while in rural Pennsylvania. It was an uncomfortable experience for me, not because of my skin color, which is pretty much white, but because of my cultural differences. My family was not Christian, nor did we behave so, and I suppose my differences were obvious. Everyone around us, for example, claimed to belong to Jesus (or to America, which curiously, especially in children’s minds, seemed to mean the same thing), and mostly, they were quite vociferous about the importance of salvation and warding off anything that might endanger grace. We were, I think, suspiciously quiet. In addition, I had a British accent, which, at first, my grade-school teachers took for a speech impediment, because they could not recognize it for what it was. (It was my father’s appearance with his pronounced British accent at a teacher’s conference that finally got me removed from my “speech therapy” sessions, which consisted of coloring pictures alone in the nurse’s room.)

By the time I was beaten up so visibly that my parents couldn’t pretend that the gulf between our family and those around us was not dangerous to their children, they had decided that perhaps Sunday school would be a way for my younger brother and me to integrate with the people with whom we went to school. And so for two weeks I went to Sunday school.

The memory is sharp in places. The basement room of the church: light came in on rafts of dust straight, it seemed to me, from the sky to the brown wooden tables where we children sat. There were eight or perhaps nine of us. I am no longer sure. I remember more clearly the man who was our teacher. In his black clothes, he had a sense of specialness that as a child I connected with, the sweep of his long belled sleeve, the plainness of his clothes, the way the sun lifted up his black-robed shoulders as if he were going to grow raven wings. I don’t remember the lesson, mostly because I could hear singing above me. Along the road where the church building stretched, upstairs in the sanctuary a service was being held. Adults, my parents not included, were singing far enough away that I could not hear distinct words but close enough that my ears would not move away from their attention to the feel of the singing. My whole body was tuned to the cadence of blue light that I could feel coming from the people-song above me. It was if the basement room where I sat was being filled with the yellow light of the sun and the blue light of the song. I was entranced by the way the two sources of sensation made me feel, and I suspect I didn’t give our teacher the deference which he thought I ought. But then he started to read us psalms and I heard that, even above the play of the light and song. I listened. When he was finished he assigned each of us a different psalm to memorize and recite the following week.

I don’t remember clearly what psalm I was to remember. I think it was the first one, because even today, I get a powerful sense of awe and wonder reading that song. It was the trees I think, their steadiness. At the same time, my awe of the psalm arises from realizing that spiritual steadiness, which comes from a kind of psychic rootedness—which comes from practices like quietly paying attention to the world—could be so clearly written and that many people, even those who claim this tradition as their own, apparently do not get at all what this implies. It’s as if they can read, even recite, but not understand: they can feel its power but not reason from its argument. It is the trees in that psalm that bear, for me, the lesson: Happy are those who do not follow the advice of the wicked…they are like trees planted by streams of water, which yield their fruit in its season, and their leaves do not wither. It seems to me that it might be suggesting that the life-world of trees might have something to teach us about how to be happy, how to wait, where to take nourishment, how to root in a place where all these happy things can happen. It does not seem to me to suggest that, wanting apples in March, the tree should be cut down as unproductive.

I went back to Sunday school the next week. I remember that I was prepared. I felt excited, open. I liked the psalm and I wanted to feed its seed, sitting in my head as the memorized lines, so when it came my turn I stood in front of my chair as the other children had done before me but instead of closing my eyes and reciting my assigned verses I asked a question instead. I asked, what does it mean? I suppose I should have recited first then asked, but as it was I was so excited by the feel of the song in my body that I wanted an answer immediately and it never occurred to me that he might not want to answer me nor care whether I understood.

The young man in his black robe, in his sun garment, standing at the head of the table, hit me. For impertinence? I don’t know.

I took off, out of the church and across the road. My brother followed. A whole series of contingent events gusted up in the wind-storm of that slap. I ran across the road to the corner store. Even though my brother and I had never stolen anything in our lives, we stole some candy. My brother felt so guilty and scared, that he confessed to our father, telling him that I was the instigator (and I was the elder). My brother came to tell me. He told me that he confessed and that he had blamed me. I was still so angry, having refused to tell my parents’ why I would never go back to Sunday school or any church ever again, still so angry from that slap, from his face as he slapped me, from his look of fear and its unbidden rage, from his look of disgust, that I pushed my brother down. He fell down the tall slope behind our house that separated the forest from our dwelling. He rolled down. He hit his head on a concrete block and went utterly still. I thought I had killed him. I ran into the trees as my mother came running out from the house. I stayed out all night, only coming home the next day.

My brother, although knocked unconscious, lived without damage. My parents wisely said nothing to me, figuring, I think, that a night out in the forest was a good enough teacher. I never went back to Sunday school. I knew from that slap, from the night with the trees, knew deep in my body, even if not in my conscious mind, that there was a fundamental difference between what the trees in the Psalm had to teach and what religion had to offer. I knew what the trees had to offer was something I could be; I knew what religion had to offer would only cause more misfortune. I knew then that I was safer picking my fights on the playground. I thought I stood a better chance at surviving the cruelty of the people I went to school with, than I did surviving adult people who like chaff that the wind drives could not control themselves in the face of their own feelings.

To be clear: I knew all these things in the long moment between the slap and the next day when I came in from the forest, but I knew them not to speak them but as feelings in my stomach, legs, my skin and hands. Nothing could have dragged me into that church again and made me stay. My entire body rebelled, recognizing the danger.

clear silver light: open ears
red thread sewing: closed mouth
pearl grey void: resonant heart
black bell deep in the solar plexus
orange fire: slow thigh hum
stone roots: curled toes, tense feet
and a hot blue knife in the palm

And yet the forest, even though there were real fears, of skunks and dangerous plants, of drowning and broken legs far from home, these were manageable. They did not make me rebel, did not make me run from terror or hatred. They made me pay attention to where I stepped, knowing that if I was careful I could probably manage this. Contrary to the church, I knew the forest might take my life but it would never try to break me.

As an adult, I have not lost the anger, not in all these years, but I think about that young man with some compassion now. I wonder what kind of life drives a body to strike at its own young with so little provocation. I wonder at the tenuous hold someone like that must have on the system to which he has given his life that a child’s question about meaning should evoke such a response. I think about why he did what he did but I cannot come up with a plausible answer. I do not know what my question meant to him but I still, occasionally, think about it—especially when faced with another violently angry or abusive Christian. Today, I think mostly about his face and the revelation of his emotions, displayed, I am sure, without any conscious control. When faced with a child asking, he broke. I think now that this means that he doesn’t actually believe in his god nor even in his faith, but rather he believes only in his church, in his place within it, his position and his authority. And so when his church hates, he hates. When his church loves, he loves. He has, in a sense, become the system that animates him. Perhaps he had no other place to go.