August 21st, 2011
reclaiming public spaces, private minds, a documentary
Bansky has a new documentary called The Antics Roadshow, which is a rather clever title I think. It runs just under 50 minutes and kicks ass. Give it a go, is my advice.
I particularly love the bit from about 44:23 to 47:20 where The Yes Men pranked Dow Chemical and, on live TV, BBC no less, accepted total responsibility for the Bhopal chemical disaster and announced a massive financial settlement for the victims and their families.
Hah!
The pie-in-the-face bit is pretty good too.
August 18th, 2011
Hilarious, and to be watched
From the Toronto Film Festival site:
Maggie Gyllenhaal and Hugh Dancy star in this cheeky romantic comedy about the invention of the vibrator. Victorian London is brought to life in vivid colour as a young doctor (Dancy) struggles to establish himself while confronting the gutsy daughter of his boss (Gyllenhaal). Rupert Everett and Felicity Jones play supporting roles.
From Jezebel:
Hysteria, of course, was a commonly-diagnosed medical diorder in the Victorian era that is no longer recognized in modern medicine. One of the cures for hysteria was a “pelvic massage,” or as we call it today, getting off.
From Pharyngula:
Arguably the greatest invention in the history of humanity
via: nearly everywhere.
May 6th, 2011
Bollywood as anti-extremism
I like the argument here, and sometimes I even like the movies, but man, I always love the colours, dances and songs.
May 2nd, 2011
Herzog interview
Mad German Auteur, Now in 3-D! is an article over GQ.
I had no idea Herzog was as interestingly nuts.
(the italics mark the interviewer’s question)
What’s the mistake with psychology and self-reflection?
“There’s something profoundly wrong—as wrong as the Spanish Inquisition was. The Spanish Inquisition had one goal, to eradicate all traces of Muslim faith on the soil of Spain, and hence you had to confess and proclaim the innermost deepest nature of your faith to the commission. And almost as a parallel event, explaining and scrutinizing the human soul, into all its niches and crooks and abysses and dark corners, is not doing good to humans. We have to have our dark corners and the unexplained. We will become uninhabitable in a way an apartment will become uninhabitable if you illuminate every single dark corner and under the table and wherever—you cannot live in a house like this anymore. And you cannot live with a person anymore—let’s say in a marriage or a deep friendship—if everything is illuminated, explained, and put out on the table. There is something profoundly wrong. It’s a mistake. It’s a fundamentally wrong approach toward human beings.”
On Herzog’s idea of a film school
Point four of the school’s online rules forcibly clarifies this: “The Rogue Film School will not teach anything technical related to filmmaking.” Other points illuminate aspects of Herzog’s aesthetic, attitude, and method. There are taboos (one of which will be already familiar): “Censorship will be enforced. There will be no talk of shamans, of yoga classes, nutritional values, herbal teas, discovering your Boundaries, and Inner Growth.” There are compulsory and voluntary reading lists. (On the former, Virgil and Hemingway. On the latter, the Warren Commission Report into the JFK assassination: “A most fantastic crime story—a most conclusive, most intelligent thing that human mind can ever put together,” Herzog tells me. “It’s a fantastic piece of human ingenuity.” He declares that anyone who has actually read it has no doubt that Oswald did it, and did it alone. “Everybody raves and rants against it, and nobody has read it, including those like Oliver Stone who has made a film on the assassination. He has not read it. I know it because I asked him. Oh no, he is not reading this kind of crap. I said, ‘You’re wrong, and shame on you.’ “) There is also a list of applicable skills for would-be filmmakers. As well as traveling on foot, these include the art of lock-picking, the creation of your own shooting permit, and the neutralization of bureaucracy.
Another skill Herzog has advocated for filmmakers (and, I suspect, pretty much anyone else whom he considers truly worthy of respect) is the ability to milk a cow: “If an actor knows how to milk a cow, I always know it will not be difficult to be in business with him.” Herzog has also previously claimed that when he walks into a room, he can tell who in there has previously had hand to udder. Or, at the very least, would.
And a remark on making movies
Yes. But shooting a film itself is nothing but banalities. [Then, as though reluctantly, he continues.] However, there’s very rare moments where I get the feeling sometimes I’m like the little girl in the fairy tale who steps out into the night, in the stars, and she holds her apron open, and the stars are raining into her apron. Those moments I have seen and I have had. But they are very rare.
March 28th, 2011
Herzog’s cave movie
http://www.differentvideos.info/videos/movie-trailers/cave-forgotten-dreams-trailer-2011-hd-7794.html
Slate didn’t give it a particularly good review, but I doubt I’m going to miss seeing it. What is it about caves these days?
March 26th, 2011
funny and irritating at the same time
December 24th, 2010
a must see
You can learn about the film here.
October 23rd, 2010
Art and its commercial arm
Recently I saw Exit Through the Gift Shop, which I loved. If you haven’t seen it, and you like street art, you probably want to rent the DVD at some point.
As you may realize, I regularly go to Wooster Collective to see the stuff from street artists around the world and today they had an interview posted about the film with Jaimie D’ Cruz and Chris King being interviewed by David Poland. It is fascinating, giving quite a nice peek into the controversy that the film and the main character have stirred up in the art world.
The film and Poland raise the issue of the (sometimes) nasty borderland between being an artist and being a salesman using art to make money. I have no answers to that. I rather think it might be the wrong question. Still, both the film and the interview raise a number of questions well worth thinking about.
October 22nd, 2010
So much
Until today I had never seen The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Yes, I know—the horror of such a cultural misstep. What an absolute delight that film!
Yet…
does it give you pain, all the things of the world to which you will never get before you die?
October 19th, 2010
still sick but
I won’t bore you with my symptoms but they are lessening. Rather than the empty DVD platter of yesterday, today it is if I have a badly scratched sucker and I get bits (I watched Exit Through the Gift Shop this afternoon), which appear is association (I was thinking about David Hume and his aesthetic judges) but don’t really relate except perhaps (there was an interesting RSAnimation on wimp today) in a decidedly non-linear fashion. One could almost say my mind is a bit circular today with a horrifying number of speed bumps and the consequent mental hiccups.
I think maybe why I connected Hume and Bansky’s film is the idea of trying to define art. Seems a waste of time really. I mean art is something that is not containable in a delineated concept. I know there have been gadzillion attempts, some of them worthy, but really. Back to Hume…see? I just slide off the mental track.
Hume had this thing about expert judges and how art can best be defined by those guys. I think “art” is word that takes its meaning from the social and linguistic context in which it display’s itself. Combined: the judges are the kings of context. They have imbibed so much knowledge and experience that they come to represent (as best as any one person can) the ethos of the times in which they live. It is that moral quality that is the ultimate context in which a piece can be judged.
OK. But why judge? Because we can’t help ourselves I suppose. Like Thierry in the film, we really want to be accepted and that requires the judgment of our peers. And to question judging at all…I suspect that’s a part of our ethos.
Oh. Are those pink fairies?

