December 30th, 2011
quiet in a human world
I came across an article called The Joy of Quiet in the NYT. Writing about the time sink of TV and the internet the author implies that in today’s world it is hard to get time to think.
Writer friends of mine pay good money to get the Freedom software that enables them to disable (for up to eight hours) the very Internet connections that seemed so emancipating not long ago. Even Intel (of all companies) experimented in 2007 with conferring four uninterrupted hours of quiet time every Tuesday morning on 300 engineers and managers. (The average office worker today, researchers have found, enjoys no more than three minutes at his or her desk without interruption.) During this period the workers were not allowed to use the phone or send e-mail, but simply had the chance to clear their heads and to hear themselves think. A majority of Intel’s trial group recommended that the policy be extended to others.
OK. So yes, it’s probably true that our world is a nightmare of little digital hands grabbing at us for attention.
But is that fundamentally different from our past? Yes the digital bit is, but not the time sinks. Not for some of us anyway.
My mother’s life (or my grandmother’s) – most of her life was spent defending those few moments alone whilst on the toilet. She spent her life pulled at by competing demands. Husbands, not so much, but still the cross-talk of work and manly games (football, cricket, horse betting, music, card parties, friends and family weekend rituals) made their lives pretty noisy too. I do think that most men in the middle classes and up often had an office door to garner some quiet but my family were predominantly lower class until very recently and they worked ship yards, factories and other such places. No office doors there.
So I wonder what is really happening about our lack of quiet. Is it really that we are noisier, more bothered by the grasping hands of our attention, or is it that the life that my maternal ancestors suffered has just spread out and infected most of us?
As the author of the article points out, sometimes the only way out is to run away. I wonder if that’s why the law (and society) is so harsh on women who “abandon” their kids and take off for the quiet of a non-human world? If oxytocin fails to make a person stay in what can be a life sentence in purgatory, then the law needs to force indentured servitude if it can, or punish the escapee if not?
Hmmm. I think I might be in a bit of bad mood today.
Anyway, yes. Silence is wonderful. I walk long hours to get some. I leave home to escape the demands of dirty dishes and empty cat food bowls. And I can spend way too much time browsing the internet whereas my mother didn’t live long enough to use the internet. Nevertheless, nearly the sum total of her life minutes were claimed by some duty, demand, or desire of one sort or another.
Apart from the specific details of our duties, I’m not sure the noise level in my life is really that much different from those ancestral women to which I can lay claim. The real difference, it seems to me, is that because of feminism, of women’s rights, I can say “no” legally even if with not too much social acceptance. And because of that, my noise level might realistically be less than that of my mother’s or grandmother’s.
And the idea of moving to rural Japan to escape digi-noise? I wonder what sorts of people can really make that happen as a solution? The whole thing smacks a bit of the golden past syndrome. Only those who see themselves in power positions in the past want it returned. Those of use who were servants rather enjoy our noisy now, because unlike then, we can get more than a half day off a week in which to go for a bit of a quiet stroll.
July 11th, 2011
what it means to be Republican these days
has everything to do with short-term thinking and the desire to control others to an unacceptable degree.
Planned Parenthood has stopped providing birth control pills and other contraception in New Hampshire after the state’s executive council rejected up to $1.8 million in funding for the group, which also provides privately-funded abortions.
The move is expected to affect an average of 120 low-income women each day. Other services provided by Planned Parenthood, including pelvic exams, were also in peril.
“Patients who used to be able to come to us for their pills now have to walk away,” said Jennifer Frizzell, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood of Northern New England.
The Republicans that compose New Hampshire’s five-member executive council voted 3-2 to reject funding for Planned Parenthood’s six clinics in the state on June 22.
The council, a vestige of the state’s colonial government that is independent of the governor, must approve all state contracts greater than $10,000.
“I am opposed to abortion,” said Raymond Wieczorek, a council member who voted against the contract. “I am opposed to providing condoms to someone. If you want to have a party, have a party but don’t ask me to pay for it.”
Under federal law, Planned Parenthood cannot use government funds to provide abortion, and Frizzell said it the group is subject to regular audits to ensure that only private money is used to pay for abortions.
So the people this is effecting are primarily poor women and their children. How deeply moral of you Mr W.
Oh Mr Raymond Wieczorek, I suspect you will come to regret this.
June 28th, 2011
women’s talk and ethnic perception
Because of the kind of life I’ve led I’ve often been in situations where I’m the minority. That’s not common for whites in North America, but that’s the way it’s been for much of my life. Now I am white, or at least I am most days. What people assume I am depends on context, on how dark my skin gets in the sun, on the clothes I wear, whether I wear my bling, my headscarf and whether my (very long) hair is braided. I suppose in old-timey South Africa I’d technically be something other than white, but I am white really.
Ethnically I am of European descent, Even if it is low-class, outsider European, it is still European and for Native Americans here that equates to white-person. And since many of my family members are Native, that makes me white. Get it?
The reason I’m telling you this is because of something really fascinating that happened because I am white. I’ll tell you about that in just a minute, but first I want to say that in all the various situations/cultures that I’ve spent any time within, there is a separate women’s communication style that seems to have some pretty strong similarities no matter what culture the women call home.
For one thing there are kitchen table rules. In the core of the domestic world there are rules by which strangers or distant family are made a part of things. You may not be given a family name, but there will be something – a glance, a cup of coffee slid your way, a teasing joke – that will let you know you are part of the kitchen table group, even if its just for that moment. This inclusivity functions for women in a way that supports the often labour-intensive lives women sometimes need to share.
Anyway this whiteness of mine and my femaleness came together at the grocery store.
I was sitting by myself at a table outside the store waiting for my children to finish the shopping. It is a table for 4 and when 2 Asian women (one Japanese, one Korean) came out needing a table to re-arrange their groceries, they glanced at me enquiringly and of course I waved my hand, smiled and said “of course.”
They sat and started to talk about the groceries they just purchased. They were in their early 20s I think. They talked about how this particular store had better prices on meat and vegetables; they talked about where other things can be purchased for good prices. The Korean woman congratulated the Japanese woman on the carefulness of her selection. She said “you shop really well.” The Japanese woman ducked her head and politely demurred, discomfited by the compliment and, I think, feeling undeserving of such high praise. And of course efficiency and money savvy is high praise amongst women in this particular sphere of experience.
One thing that was of great interest to me in this time is that they carefully kept their bodies partially facing me and although they didn’t address me directly, each woman glanced at me out of the corner of her eye at least once. Partly this special politeness had to do with age. I’m 54 and definitely grey and I tend to trigger respect in younger women.
Then the Korean woman started saying that she wasn’t as good a shopper as her friend, and that (starting on another example of her weakness as a traditional woman in her cultural context) she liked to cook for just herself and, in a slightly louder voice and in a different tone she said, “I’m so white.”
They both did that corner-of-the-eye glance and lifted the muscles around their mouths. It was a praise statement meant to include me. The odd thing is that it was exactly the same kind of kitchen table inclusion that I have experienced in other cultural situations, including my family on the Reservation. Women’s talk.
In that moment I realized that for them, being “white” was a symbolic end-point in the scale of strong female behaviours. Becoming “white” for her contrasts to the group-ethic of her traditional role as a Korean woman. Becoming “white” means taking on (temporarily, and in the right context) the identity of an individualist, that of a woman on her own who knows how to take care of herself. In a sense she was claiming bi-cultural status and skills. She was claiming kinship with me around our version of the kitchen table.
I nodded very slightly toward them. Smiled enough that they could see the lift beside my eyes.
I was surprised though, because claiming “whiteness” (or accusing someone of “whiteness”) is not a positive thing in any Indian culture I know and that is where I have spent most of my cross-cultural time in the last decades. One time a niece was told I was white by a family member and she was so upset she came to me and wanted me to deny the charge. And it was a charge. I don’t think she could quite get her head around what she knew of my behaviour with what she knew of the symbolic content of whiteness.
Anyway, don’t you find that really interesting? One of the things I really liked about the encounter is the realization that people today are much more comfortable with multiple identities. She is really OK with being white sometimes and Korean other times, and that occurs regardless of what she looks like. I so love that this is true for her.
January 31st, 2011
fierce women and reaching justice
As you may have guessed from my post on having a fever, I picked up the flu but as of this morning I feel much, much better. Burned it out over the last two miserable days I think. Anyway, lucky for me I had the perfect “sick” book.
I used to be a big mystery fan, but read very little fiction these days. I had, and still have, a very particular taste in this kind of novel: strong female protagonists. Don’t really care if they kick ass through magic or fists but I do want them to be ethical, smart, fierce and independent. Lucky for me I was reading Ricki Tannen’s book and through that heard of Blanche White; I ordered a copy of one of the Blanche novels through my library and picked it up the morning of the day the flu sucked out my life-force and flushed it. Unlucky for me there are only four “Blanche” books and I just finished Blanche Cleans Up which only leaves three to go.
Blanche is the best kind of kick-ass woman I know. She’s fiercely independent but capable of loving; she’s nosy but ethical; she can tell the difference between justice and revenge; she’s realistic about how rotten-god-damned-awful “true believers” of any sort can be. I’m in love.
So much so that I asked my bookseller to find copies of all four so I can get my Blanche-hour when I want or need it.
Blanche is a maid/housekeeper/cook/chatelaine of the major-general type. The added bonus for me is the racial content. Blanche is black; her employers are white. It was really interesting to me to see the invisibility laws in action through the eyes of the author of the Blanche novels. I recognized many of them since the same “laws” work with Indian-white relations. Learning how to live with contempt pointed at you is a major pain-in-the-ass, but if it can be done without exploding or imploding, it can create the Blanches of the world. I have to say one of the reasons I like Blanche so much is that I am still struggling with the 3rd option (that is living with it instead of imploding or exploding). I really do appreciate the road map to success given to me via Blanche.
And here’s the real kicker – Blanche is a liberal, but one with common sense. She’s pro love and not anti-gay, pro choice not anti-woman, pro justice and not anti-white (or anyone in particular). Her one apparently absolute requirement is that people act with compassion and the recognition that we aren’t just individuals, but that we are also members of a family and of a society and should act with that in mind—and for women, that they aren’t just members of a family or of a society, but that they are individuals too. Her other “requirement” is that people act. Move through the world and see, sure. But also act.
There are things that can’t be changed but that doesn’t mean you can’t do something against it. There’s a bit in the novel where Blanche describes finding the kiddy-porn stash of a previous client. Now she knows she can’t do much against the guy (racial/class politics being what they realistically are), so instead she pours ammonia on his pictures and walks out on the job. Then she lets it go and moves on to the next job. Sometimes the people-world sucks and it makes it so that public justice is almost impossible to obtain, but to stay sane, to stay human (the way Blanche would describe it) means you have to take a stand for justice and refuse revenge. The “ammonia stand”, I now think of it.
Anyway, love, love, love Blanche.
December 24th, 2010
a must see
You can learn about the film here.
November 29th, 2009
Point of view and being female
On Wooster Collective I saw this. Vera’s Flickr photostream is here.
The Women Unbound reading challenge (which Litlove mentions here) is something I have been thinking about since I first came across it. For years, from the time I was quite a small girl, until I was through my second degree, I did a bunch of heavy lifting when it came to feminist reading. I don’t want to revisit all those books, although I have incorporated what they offered me in my day-to-day thinking about what I can do and what I am.
I don’t choose books based on gender issues any longer. I have narrowed my focus to a rather small subset of what it means to be human that, seems to me anyway, to be prior to what it means for me to be a woman in the world. Not that my gender doesn’t effect how things are for me. It does. Invisibility, condescending assumptions and other such typical things are just a part of what it is to be in this time and place. Having said that I no longer read books based on gender, I most definitely count myself as a feminist. I think any woman who has her own bank account, drives and votes has to recognize herself as a feminist on pain of terrible hypocrisy.
I have noticed that if I am going to read something light, it almost always involves a female protagonist – Olive Kitteridge, for example. Notable exceptions are books by Indian (Native American) authors, Cormac McCarthy and Terry Pratchett (whose novels Night Watch and Monstrous Regiment still make me roll around with laughter. Though, come to think about it Monstrous Regiment is about women pretending to be men so they can fight in the on-going war, with predictably hilarious results – this is Pratchett after all).
So I don’t think I can really say I am going to start reading books to meet the challenge, but what I think I can do is look at what it means to be human and female through art. That’s why Vera. But you never know, if I run across an interesting fictional woman in a novel or even one in a non-fiction setting, I’ll pop it up here.


